National Issues, Paris Attacks, PSA, Statement Updated: November 14, 2015, 11:36 AMPosted: November 13, 2015, 7:40 PMHarrisburg, PA – In the wake of the attacks last evening in Paris, the Wolf Administration reminds Pennsylvanians to be vigilant and report suspicious activity to law enforcement.There remains no known imminent threat to the commonwealth or its citizens. However, the Office of Homeland Security advises that police in Philadelphia have announced increased security for the weekend and citizens may experience increased security in other areas of the commonwealth as a result of the attacks. Pennsylvanians should be vigilant, remain patient and be respectful towards law enforcement.Pennsylvania State Police are encouraging the public to report suspicious activity to 1 (888) 292-1919 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Additionally, State Police also have a smartphone app to help citizens report suspicious activity. The “See Something, Send Something” app is available at no cost for iPhone and Android users.If any citizens feel like they are in imminent danger or emergency, they should always call 9-1-1 immediately.# # #Harrisburg, PA – Governor Tom Wolf released the following statement on the attacks in Paris:“On behalf of all Pennsylvanians, Frances and I extend our deepest condolences to the French people and all those affected by these horrific acts of violence. Our thoughts and prayers are with victims of this heartbreaking tragedy and their families.“At this time, law enforcement reports no credible or increased threat to Pennsylvanians. The Pennsylvania State Police and Office of Homeland Security are in communication with the FBI and other federal agencies regarding the attacks in Paris and are continuing to monitor the situation for any changes.”# # #Like Governor Tom Wolf on Facebook: Facebook.com/GovernorWolf November 13, 2015 SHARE Email Facebook Twitter UPDATED: Governor Wolf Statement on Attacks in Paris; Wolf Administration Reminds Pennsylvanians to be Vigilant, Report Suspicious Activity
Close Forgot password? Please put in your email: Send me my password! Close message Login This blog post All blog posts Subscribe to this blog post’s comments through… RSS Feed Subscribe via email Subscribe Subscribe to this blog’s comments through… RSS Feed Subscribe via email Subscribe Follow the discussion Comments (8) Logging you in… Close Login to IntenseDebate Or create an account Username or Email: Password: Forgot login? Cancel Login Close WordPress.com Username or Email: Password: Lost your password? Cancel Login Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout Logged in as Admin Options Disable comments for this page Save Settings Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity Loading comments… You are about to flag this comment as being inappropriate. Please explain why you are flagging this comment in the text box below and submit your report. The blog admin will be notified. Thank you for your input. -1 Vote up Vote down oldman · 353 weeks ago Ok Pinocchio – which is it? “I can not comment on student disciplinary matters,” Jamison said. “I will say there is no threat to the safety of the students inside the school building.” or News that last week there had been reports of someone in a nearby town driving around schools and taking pictures of kids on the playground. He said since then they have been conducting lockdown drills to monitor school access. Or now?? The juvenile, whose name is being withheld because he is under 18, has been charged by the Sumner County Attorney’s office with “unlawfully, feloniously, and willfully threaten to commit violence while in school,” on Friday, Oct. 25, 2013. So was he misleading the public by first stating it was a “student disciplinary matters” then switching the story when it really was a student matter?? Report Reply 2 replies · active 353 weeks ago +4 Vote up Vote down Proud Blujay · 353 weeks ago Ok Old Man — There was not a threat to the students because the school was in lockdown and the student who had posted the threat was removed from the facility. So it was most certainly a student disciplinary action. ALSO, there was a report received from Caldwell officials that someone was taking pics of students in a town 20 miles south of us. These two incidents occurred around the same time, so not sure where you are confused. USD 360 Admninistration and Staff do an excellent job in not only educating our students, but protecting them as well! Report Reply -2 Vote up Vote down JustMe · 353 weeks ago So the lockdown was cause by?…….. Report Reply 0 Vote up Vote down Let’sMoveOnNow · 353 weeks ago Think about it this way “oldman” Since there is/was a criminal investigation taking place, I am assuming this is the reason for Mr. Jamison’s actions. He wanted parents to be informed but not freaked out, since their children were coming home saying they were on a lockdown. He couldnt come out and tell us everything we all wanted to know because he was probably TOLD BY LAW to keep his mouth shut. Once again I am just assuming. Just assumptions being thrown out again ……maybe Mr. Jamison didn’t want the “threat” or “threats” to get upset that people were blasting them on every media outlet, and then take it out on the school like they said they would? MAKES SENSE TO ME?!?!?!?!?! I don’t understand why people are not more grateful about this. I even more so don’t understand why you are calling him “Pinocchio”. Do you personally know Mr. Jamison? Let me tell you about Mr. Jamison who was an awesome teacher/ and even better Principal and the best Superintendent. So since you know nothing about the situation is it really your place to judge him or anyone else in such a negative manner? Report Reply 1 reply · active 353 weeks ago +3 Vote up Vote down Guest · 353 weeks ago If you lock down the school the parents have a right to know why! And they need to know the day it happened and not days later! If my kids went there i’d be glad they locked it down but P.O.’d that I didn’t know why before hand. I might have decided to just keep my kids home for their own safety. My kids! My responsibility! My choice! Report Reply -3 Vote up Vote down oldman · 353 weeks ago If the police had asked him to not comment, then he should have just said “I have been asked not to comment at this time”. Instead, his comments could be viewed as trying to mislead the public. My momma always said, if you tell the truth, you will always tell the same story, no matter how many times you re-tell it! Report Reply 0 replies · active 353 weeks ago +1 Vote up Vote down Want over Need · 353 weeks ago People seem to have lost the ability to judge whether someting is a Want to Know, or a Need to Know. In this case, all you NEED to know is that there was a perception of a possible threat at the school, and that this threat was dealt with appropriately by both the school and the police force. You may WANT to know all of the details, but in reality, you don’t NEED them. There are privacy laws in place that will often prevent sharing details of this type. Report Reply 0 replies · active 353 weeks ago 0 Vote up Vote down Guest · 353 weeks ago Everyone be careful what you type. Cause if Tracy disagrees he’ll suspend commenting. And if he’s gonna suspend commenting on hot topics then why even go here to read stories or comment. Report Reply 0 replies · active 353 weeks ago Post a new comment Enter text right here! Comment as a Guest, or login: Login to IntenseDebate Login to WordPress.com Login to Twitter Go back Tweet this comment Connected as (Logout) Email (optional) Not displayed publicly. Name Email Website (optional) Displayed next to your comments. Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to it here. Posting anonymously. Tweet this comment Submit Comment Subscribe to None Replies All new comments Comments by IntenseDebate Enter text right here! Reply as a Guest, or login: Login to IntenseDebate Login to WordPress.com Login to Twitter Go back Tweet this comment Connected as (Logout) Email (optional) Not displayed publicly. Name Email Website (optional) Displayed next to your comments. Not displayed publicly. If you have a website, link to it here. Posting anonymously. Tweet this comment Cancel Submit Comment Subscribe to None Replies All new comments by Tracy McCue, Sumner Newscow â€”Â A 17-year-old juvenile male from Caldwell was charged Monday with one count of aggravated criminal threat, a level 5 person felony; or alternatively a criminal threat, a level 9 person felony which resulted in a lockdown of the Caldwell Public School building last week.The juvenile, whose name is being withheld because he is under 18, has been charged by the Sumner County Attorney’s office with “unlawfully, feloniously, and willfully threaten to commit violence while in school,” on Friday, Oct. 25, 2013.According to the complaint, that while in school, the juvenile allegedly used words indicating that he was so mad he could kill someone, possibly one of the students.He allegedly made such a threat with reckless disregard of the risk of causing a lockdown of any building at the Caldwell USD 360 school district, the complaint read.The juvenile and his mother are required to appear before Sumner County juvenile court on November 27 at 3:30 p.m. At that time the juvenile will answer to the offense charges in the complaint.Caldwell School District operated a lockdown drill in which all doors were locked last week.